Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Camera Recommendations?


Dalmation

Status: Offline
Posts: 1334
Date:
RE: Camera Recommendations?


IWN wrote:

Kodak Easyshare c875, definitely. o_o

It's 8 MP and if I'm not mistaken it's $110. Not sure though.
But yeah, it' takes the most awesome pictures.

It has 20 settings, such as snow, beach, landscape, sport [for things in motion], and soooo many more.

It's so worth the money. Awesome quality too.

Here's a picture I took with it. :O



wab;

And here's what the camera looks like:




Hope I helped. ;D



My grandma has a camera thats sony easy share with those settings, it just looks different because it hooks up to a photo printer! =o I agree, its awesome, but I also like the slim ones that aare from sony i think. They take great pics too. =)


-- Edited by WoofMeowPal at 15:40, 2007-08-18

__________________
i335544631_41371_6.gif
IWN


Siberian Husky

Status: Offline
Posts: 10297
Date:

WoofMeowPal wrote:

 

IWN wrote:

Kodak Easyshare c875, definitely. o_o

It's 8 MP and if I'm not mistaken it's $110. Not sure though.
But yeah, it' takes the most awesome pictures.

It has 20 settings, such as snow, beach, landscape, sport [for things in motion], and soooo many more.

It's so worth the money. Awesome quality too.

Here's a picture I took with it. :O



wab;

And here's what the camera looks like:




Hope I helped. ;D



My grandma has a camera thats sony easy share with those settings, it just looks different because it hooks up to a photo printer! =o I agree, its awesome, but I also like the slim ones that aare from sony i think. They take great pics too. =)


-- Edited by WoofMeowPal at 15:40, 2007-08-18

 



This is a Kodak though.
-confused-

 



__________________

wanna lickle my nipplez 


Poodle

Status: Offline
Posts: 1919
Date:

I have a friend and Aunt with a Kodak Easyshare. And they suck like crazy. No joke.. they're worth $2.

Buut you people with Kodak cameras might have different versions. xP

I'm surprised no one has a Canon o.O

Oh, and PL16, try finding "Consumer Reports" magazine at your library. They give reviews on EVERYTHING. So does the Walstreet journal.. but I don't know if that's only an area newspaper.

But look into a couple different brands and versions online.

It's YOUR decision. So look up about Canon cameras and Kodak cameras. Obviously, Kodak is popular here. But Canon is nice too. :B

__________________
horses = love


Beagle

Status: Offline
Posts: 44
Date:

_DF1 wrote:

I have a friend and Aunt with a Kodak Easyshare. And they suck like crazy. No joke.. they're worth $2.

Buut you people with Kodak cameras might have different versions. xP

I'm surprised no one has a Canon o.O

Oh, and PL16, try finding "Consumer Reports" magazine at your library. They give reviews on EVERYTHING. So does the Walstreet journal.. but I don't know if that's only an area newspaper.

But look into a couple different brands and versions online.

It's YOUR decision. So look up about Canon cameras and Kodak cameras. Obviously, Kodak is popular here. But Canon is nice too. :B




 I've used both actually O:
my moms old camera was a Canon.

Aamazing camera I might say :P
but I just stick to what I know, and that's Kodak.
The camera that NDogGal has, The Z710 looks amazing, and has good quality pictures :P
And it's fairly cheep for the camera that it is.
Don't get me wrong, Canon's are good cameras too.
But if I had MY choice, I'd get the Z710 ;P
But they're both really good ^__^



__________________

By: DM4 I loves it thank youu :D
IWN


Siberian Husky

Status: Offline
Posts: 10297
Date:

_DF1 wrote:

I have a friend and Aunt with a Kodak Easyshare. And they suck like crazy. No joke.. they're worth $2.

Buut you people with Kodak cameras might have different versions. xP

I'm surprised no one has a Canon o.O

Oh, and PL16, try finding "Consumer Reports" magazine at your library. They give reviews on EVERYTHING. So does the Walstreet journal.. but I don't know if that's only an area newspaper.

But look into a couple different brands and versions online.

It's YOUR decision. So look up about Canon cameras and Kodak cameras. Obviously, Kodak is popular here. But Canon is nice too. :B



Heh my dad has a Canon. It sucks. I used to use it before I got my purdy Kodak. It's only a 3 MP so that's probably the reason why. Going from a 3 MP to an 8 MP camera is a big difference.

 



__________________

wanna lickle my nipplez 


Basset Hound

Status: Offline
Posts: 1497
Date:

I have a Canon, and I probably would have said Canon about a year ago, but after Ngal's camera with 10x Zoom and 7mp, I would definitely say Kodak Z710. Mine is Canon PowerShot A520--takes nice pictures, but has pretty much no zoom and only 4 megapixels. x_X I WANT MORE ZOOM. furious 4x zoom is pretty much NOTHING.

__________________


Poodle

Status: Offline
Posts: 1919
Date:

Really? Well my Canon is nice. You guys might have had crappy ones. I don't know though. Mine is nice as far as I'm concerned.

But yeah, Kodak cameras are okay. I never really liked Kodak, but it's up to you. :D

Oh, and compare my pictures to someone who has a Kodak. I don't notice a single difference; I like my picture's quality better. Unless you have Ngal's camera xD Her's is really nice. It's good at closeups :D

And I agree with Pinky :D Get Ngal's amera (I want her camera for Christmas :D)

-- Edited by _DF1 at 15:09, 2007-08-19

__________________
horses = love
IWN


Siberian Husky

Status: Offline
Posts: 10297
Date:

_DF1 wrote:

Really? Well my Canon is nice. You guys might have had crappy ones. I don't know though. Mine is nice as far as I'm concerned.

But yeah, Kodak cameras are okay. I never really liked Kodak, but it's up to you. :D

Oh, and compare my pictures to someone who has a Kodak. I don't notice a single difference; I like my picture's quality better. Unless you have Ngal's camera xD Her's is really nice. It's good at closeups :D



-- Edited by _DF1 at 15:07, 2007-08-19



I guess it was an older model, I dunno. Sometimes it took good pictures, but the quality was just..no.

meh. I guess once you get attached to your own camera that you love you feel different about other people's cameras.
I don't know. o.0

 



__________________

wanna lickle my nipplez 


Poodle

Status: Offline
Posts: 1919
Date:

IWN wrote:

_DF1 wrote:

Really? Well my Canon is nice. You guys might have had crappy ones. I don't know though. Mine is nice as far as I'm concerned.

But yeah, Kodak cameras are okay. I never really liked Kodak, but it's up to you. :D

Oh, and compare my pictures to someone who has a Kodak. I don't notice a single difference; I like my picture's quality better. Unless you have Ngal's camera xD Her's is really nice. It's good at closeups :D



-- Edited by _DF1 at 15:07, 2007-08-19



I guess it was an older model, I dunno. Sometimes it took good pictures, but the quality was just..no.

meh. I guess once you get attached to your own camera that you love you feel different about other people's cameras.
I don't know. o.0

 




Yeah, probably. My camera doesn't have enough zoom, and it takes excellent quality pictures from a distance. Closeups are very hard to get. So yeah.

__________________
horses = love


Flyer-Fan Admin

Status: Offline
Posts: 7959
Date:

I don't know Canon's Powershots. I had a A300, I absolutly HATED it. :P I couldn't get half as nice shots as I know do with my Z710. Canon's Rebels though..they pwn ALL. XD

__________________

GO FLYERS GO!
«First  <  1 2 3 | Page of 3  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard