I was considering getting it, but I need to know, how is it different then GIMP? As far as I know, Gimp can do almost anything PS can do, but I'm sure I can be proven wrong.
Well, Photoshop is quite hard to understand when you first get it. It's SOMEWHAT like GIMP, in example, GIMP uses layers, and Photoshop too. It's just that PS is more complex.
__________________
just came by to say goodbye. Leaving this place for good. Psycho sucks. Bye.
Well, Photoshop is quite hard to understand when you first get it. It's SOMEWHAT like GIMP, in example, GIMP uses layers, and Photoshop too. It's just that PS is more complex.
If I get PS I'm going to buy a book to go with it. :p
I have before. Photoshop 7.0. It's easier than Gimp IMO, in gimp, if you want to do lineart, you need to outline everything. Then, if it's a scanned image, you need to make a new layer, do the linart on that layer, go back to the background, and get rid of the pencil. x_x XD with photoshop, it outlines by itself, i've seen tutorials for it.
Thanks everyone, but I decided not to get PS. :p Turns out GIMP actually is sort of a photoshop alternative, plus I already know GIMP pretty well and that took a long time, I wouldn't want to re-learn everything in PS. GIMP doesn't have ALL of the features PS does, but most of them. Gimp can edit photos like Photoshop can, you just need to learn it.